USCIS FAQs on Intercountry Adoption
Office of Communications
U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services
Frequently Asked
Questions
Intercountry Adoptions
USCIS has received many questions related to the
new Hague intercountry adoption process and the orphan adoption process since
the implementation of the Hague Adoption Convention on April 1, 2008.
Hague and
Orphan Adoptions
Q: I obtained a full and final adoption of a child in a Hague Convention
Country prior to April 1, 2008, but did not file a Form I-600A or Form I-600
prior to April 1, 2008. May I still file the Form I-600A or Form I-600?
A:
Yes, a Form I-600A,
(Application for Advance
Processing of Orphan Petition)
or Form I-600, (Petition
to Classify Orphan as an Immediate Relative) may
be filed on or after April 1, 2008,
in this situation. The definitions for “Convention adoptee” and
“Convention adoption” in 8 CFR 204.301 state
that an intercountry
adoption is subject to the Hague Convention and the Hague Convention adoption
rules
only if
the adoption
occurs on or after April 1, 2008. The USCIS Hague interim rule, therefore, does
not apply to a case in which the adoption was already completed before April 1,
2008. Therefore, a Form I-600A or I-600 may be filed after April 1, 2008, if
the adoption was completed before April 1, 2008. If the prospective adoptive
parents are suitable as adoptive parents and the child qualifies as an orphan,
the Forms I-600A and I-600 may be approved and the child may immigrate under
section 101(b)(1)(F) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
Q: I obtained
temporary or legal custody of a child in a Hague Convention country prior to
April 1, 2008 and I plan to adopt the child on or after April 1, 2008. May I
still seek a Hague Convention adoption? What forms do I file?
A:
The Hague
Adoption Convention and the USCIS Hague interim Rule apply to any adoption, on
or after April 1, 2008, of a child from a Hague Convention country
unless
a Form I-600A or
Form I-600 was filed before April 1, 2008. However, the Hague interim rule
requires denial of a Form
I-800 (Petition to
Classify Convention Adoptee as an Immediate Relative)
if the prospective adoptive parents
adopted the child, or acquired custody for purposes
of adoption, before the provisional approval of the Form I-800. This provision,
however, was not in force before April 1, 2008. Therefore, a prospective
adoptive parent who obtained custody before this date would not have been under
any obligation to defer the acquisition of custody. If it can be established
that the prospective adoptive parents obtained custody for purposes of adoption
before
April 1, 2008,
USCIS will not deny the Form I-800 based solely on the basis of legal custody
which was obtained before a Form I-800 had been provisionally approved, since
the Hague Convention was not in force at the time of the grant of custody.
Q: I obtained
legal custody of a child in a Hague Convention country for purposes of
emigration and adoption after April 1, 2008, but before the provisional approval
of Form I-800. May I still seek a Hague Convention adoption?
A:
The Hague
Adoption Convention and USCIS Hague interim rule provides that a Form I-800
cannot generally be provisionally approved if the prospective adoptive parents
adopted a child or obtained custody for purposes of emigration and adoption
before the provisional approval of a Form I-800. In these circumstances, for
prospective adoptive parents to file Form I-800 and be eligible for a
provisional approval, they will typically need to show that a legal custody
order was voided, vacated, annulled, or otherwise terminated. The Form I-800 may
generally be approved only if a new adoption or custody order
September 29, 2008
is granted
after the
first custody order was voided, annulled, or otherwise terminated,
and
after USCIS has
provisionally approved Form I-800.
Q: I adopted or
obtained custody of a child for emigration and adoption after April 1, 2008, but
before the provisional approval of Form I-800, and I cannot void or vacate the
adoption or custody order. May I still seek a Hague Convention adoption?
A:
Adopting or
obtaining custody of a child before provisional approval of a Form I-800 is not
consistent with the principles of the Hague Adoption Convention, and may
complicate the adjudication of the child’s Form I-800. A cardinal principle of
the Hague Adoption Convention is that a child’s eligibility to immigrate to the
prospective adoptive parent’s country should be resolved before completion of
the proposed adoption. The purpose of this principle is to minimize the risk
that a child will not be able to join his or her prospective adoptive family in
their home country. As clearly stated in the instructions to Forms I-800A and
Form I-800, and in 8 CFR 204.309(b)(2), prospective adoptive parents are
cautioned not to accept a proposed adoption placement, or complete an adoption
that is subject to the Convention, until after USCIS has provisionally approved
the Form I-800 and the Department of State has issued the article 5 notice under
22 CFR 42.24(i).
The prospective
adoptive parent should make every effort, under the law of the sending country,
to have the premature adoption or custody order voided, vacated, annulled, or
otherwise terminated, before filing the Form I-800. If the prospective adoptive
parent presents evidence from the Central Authority of the country of the
child’s habitual residence establishing that the law of that country does not
permit the adoption to be voided, vacated, annulled, or otherwise terminated,
USCIS will notify the prospective adoptive parent of any additional evidence
that may need to be presented in order to support provisional approval of the
Form I-800. Prospective adoptive parents should keep in mind that, in at least
some cases, adopting the child before provisional approval of the Form I-800 may
require USCIS to determine that the adoption does not comply with the Convention
and, consequently, cannot be the basis for approval of a Form I-800.
Q: May I foster
a child from a Hague Convention country prior to the I-800A approval?
A:
Typically,
accepting a foster care arrangement before completing the Hague Adoption
Convention process would not be consistent with the general purpose of the
Convention, which promotes placing the child in the care of prospective adoptive
parents only if both the sending country and the receiving country have
determined that an intercountry adoption is permitted. Whether a foster care
arrangement would actually be contrary to the Hague Adoption Convention and
regulations, however, will have to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Note
that, even if a foster care arrangement is not “custody for purposes of
emigration and adoption,” as defined in 8 CFR 204.301, the steps taken to obtain
a foster care arrangement may well involve “contact” with the child’s birth
parent(s) or other caregiver. Article 29 of the Convention and 8 CFR
204.309(b)(2) restricts the ability to have contact with the birth parent(s) or
other caregivers.
USCIS strongly
recommends that prospective adoptive parent(s) apply for intercountry adoption
through the Hague Adoption Convention process by using Forms I-800A and I-800,
and obtaining approval of their Form I-800A,
Application
for Determination of Suitability to Adopt a Child from a Convention Country,
and a provisional approval of their Form I-800, before assuming responsibility
for providing foster care for a child. Carefully following the Hague Adoption
Convention process serves the child’s best interest by ensuring that all of the
steps designed for protection of the child are completed before placement.
If there is an
emergency that appears to warrant taking responsibility for a child before the
filing and approval of Forms I-800A and I-800, the prospective adoptive
parent(s) should work through the Central Authority of the sending country to
arrange foster care, to ensure that any contact with the child, the birth
parent(s), or other caregivers that occurs in this process, is permissible under
the Hague Adoption Convention and the USCIS Hague interim rule.
Q: May a
prospective adoptive parent with an approved,
grandfathered
I-600A
indicating that they intend to adopt from a non-Hague country change to a Hague
Convention Country and still continue an orphan adoption?
A:
Yes. The
Hague interim rule allows prospective adoptive parent(s) who filed an I-600A or
I-600 prior to April 1, 2008, to be grandfathered under U.S. law. Included in
this grandfathering provision is the ability for a prospective adoptive parent
to change his/her Form I-600A approval from a non-Hague Convention country to a
Hague Convention country, as long as the Form I-600A was filed prior to April 1,
2008, and continues to be valid at the time the request for change of overseas
site notification is submitted. For a prospective adoptive parent who filed Form
I-600A before April 1, 2008, but did not designate a specific country at the
time of filing Form I-600A, he/she may designate a Convention country at a later
time.
PLEASE
NOTE:
It is important that families who filed an I-600A prior to April 1, 2008 and
desire to change to a Hague Convention country understand that while their case
is grandfathered under U.S. law, this does not mean that the other Hague
Convention country must permit the adoption to take place under U.S. orphan
regulations. The other country could require that the case proceed as a Hague
adoption, which would require the filing of Forms I-800A and I-800.
Q: May a
prospective adoptive parent with an approved I-600A, who filed after April 1,
2008 indicating that they intend to adopt from a non-Hague Convention country,
change to a Hague Convention country and still continue with an orphan adoption?
A:
No. A
prospective adoptive parent with an approved I-600A, who filed after April 1,
2008 indicating that they intend to adopt from a non-Hague Convention country
may not change to a Hague Convention country. If the prospective adoptive parent
wants to adopt from a Hague Convention country, forms I- 800A and I-800 must be
filed.
Q: My I-600A was
filed before April 1, 2008 (implementation of Hague Convention). Is it possible
to extend the I-600A approval?
A:
Yes. An
approved I-600A is valid for 18 months. A prospective adoptive parent may
request a onetime, no-charge extension of your I-600A. To request this
extension, submit a request in writing for an extension of your approved I-600A
to the USCIS office that approved your I-600A. There is no specific form to fill
out – simply submit a written request for a one-time, no-charge extension of
your valid, approved Form I-600A. An updated or amended home study must
accompany this request. Apply prior to 90 days before the expiration of the
I-600A. If your request for extension is approved, your I-600A approval will be
extended 18 months from the expiration date of the original I-600A.
Q: If my request
for an extension of my I-600A approval is granted, when will the new extension
expire – as of the expiration date of the original approval or the date of the
decision to extend it?
A:
The new approval will
be effective as of the expiration date of the original approval, rather than the
date of the decision to extend the approval. For example, if the original
approval expired January 1, 2008, the extension will expire July 1, 2009.
Q: What will the
immigrant visa classification be for Convention Adoptees?
A:
Upon final
approval of the I-800 petition, a child may be issued an IH-3, IH-4, or B-2
visa. An IH-3 is a Hague Convention Child adopted abroad and who automatically
acquires U.S. citizenship upon entry to the U.S. An IH-4 is a Hague Convention
Child coming to be adopted in the U.S. IH-4 children do not automatically
acquire U.S. citizenship, but are lawful permanent residents until the adoption
is full and final. Children entering as a B-2 temporary visitor for pleasure are
admitted under Section 322 interview, naturalization, and then depart the
country.
Q: Will USCIS
provide me with documentation of my child’s citizenship (IH-3)?
A:
Yes. USCIS
will issue a Certificate of Citizenship from our Buffalo District Office within
45 days of receipt of the visa packet.
Q: Will USCIS
provide me with proof of my child’s lawful permanent resident status (IH-4)?
A:
Yes. USCIS
will issue a lawful permanent resident card, Form I-551 within days of receipt
of the visa packet.
National Benefits Center (NBC) Processing of Hague Adoptions
Q: Which USCIS
office adjudicates and approves Forms I-800A and I-800?
A:
The NBC is
the only USCIS office that fully adjudicates forms I-800A and I-800 to
completion.
Q: How long does
it take for a USCIS field office to send Forms I-800A, I-800, and other required
documents to NBC?
A:
USCIS field
offices generally mail forms I-800A, I-800, and other required documents within
24 hrs of receipt.
Q: Are forms
I-800A being forwarded from NBC to the National Visa Center (NVC), or are I-
800As going directly from NBC to an overseas Embassy/Consulate?
A:
Approved
I-800A applications are sent from the NBC to the NVC.
Q: What is the
NBC’s timeframe for processing I-800A applications?
A:
Cases are
targeted for completion within 90 days of receipt. Cases that are properly filed
and submitted with complete home studies may be processed without delay.
Q: What is the
NBC’s intended timeframe for processing I-800 petitions?
A:
All cases are
targeted for completion within 90 days of receipt. Cases that are properly filed
and submitted with a complete Hague Convention Article 16 report on the child,
may be processed without delay.
Q: How will
adoption agencies and the general public be notified when the direct mail
program is implemented for the receipt of forms I-800A and I-800? When do you
anticipate it will be operational?
A:
On August 26,
2008 USCIS issued an Update
announcing the expansion of USCIS’ Direct Mail
program to include Forms I-800A and I-800. Beginning on September 25, 2008,
applicants must submit Forms I-800, I-800A, and all related supplements and
forms to the USCIS Chicago Lockbox facility for initial processing, using the
following address:
U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services
P.O. Box 805695
Chicago, IL
60680-4118
If you are filing
Hague-related Forms I-601, Application for Waiver of Ground of Inadmissibility;
I-864, Affidavit of Support Under Section 213A of the Act; I-864EZ, Affidavit of
Support Under Section 213A of the Act; or I-864W, Intending Immigrant’s
Affidavit of Support Exemption; with Form I-800, you must also send these forms
to the Lockbox address. For more information on this processing change, please
visit
www.uscis.gov/pressroom.
Q: What is the
procedure for expeditious processing of Special Needs children?
A:
At this time,
a significant majority of all pending cases are for special needs children.
While there is no procedure for expeditious processing, all cases are targeted
for completion within 90 days of receipt. Cases that are properly filed and
submitted with complete home studies may be processed without delay.
Hague Adoptions - Home Study
Q: If the home
study agency/preparer is conducting two home studies at the same time (e.g.,
domestic and China), does this have to be stated in the home study?
A:
Yes. In this
situation we may consider the additional home study as a prior home study.
Consistent with regulatory requirements the home study preparer should:
1)
Identify the agency involved in each prior or terminated home study
2)
State when the prior home study process began
3)
Include the date the prior home study was completed
4)
Explain whether the prior home study recommended for or against finding
the applicant or additional adult member of the household suitable for adoption,
foster care, or other custodial care of a child. If a prior home study was
terminated without completion, the current home study must indicate when the
prior home study began, the date of termination, and the reason for the
termination.
If the other home
study has not yet been completed, please note that in the home study.
Q: If I receive
a raise at work, am I required to submit a home study amendment?
A:
No. However,
if your income decreases a home study amendment is required.
Q: How much time
can lapse between the visit to the home and the completion of the home study?
(Some home studies may take longer if there is difficulty in obtaining child
abuse clearances from another country, especially for military cases.)
A:
At least one
home visit must be completed during the course of the home study process. The
home study must not be more than 6 months old at the time it is submitted to
USCIS. There is no requirement regarding the timeliness of when, during the home
study process, the home visit must occur.
Q: What if the
home study preparer is not able to determine whether a foreign country has a
child abuse registry, in order to conduct the child abuse registry checks
overseas?
A:
The
purpose of 8 CFR 204.311(i) is to ensure that USCIS has access to any readily
available evidence that may relate to the applicant’s suitability as an adoptive
parent. There is no obligation, of course, to provide information that simply is
not available. If a country does not have a child abuse registry, it is enough
for the home study preparer to make this fact clear in the home study.
USCIS has sought to
determine which countries, other than the United States, maintain “child abuse
registries” in the sense intended in the regulation. As this information becomes
available with respect to a particular country, USCIS will make the information
available. Until such time as USCIS is able to verify that a particular country
does have such a child abuse registry, USCIS will find that a home study
complies with this requirement in 8 CFR 204.311(i) if the home study preparer
states in the home study that the home study preparer has consulted the Central
Authority of the foreign country (if it is a Hague Adoption Convention country)
or other competent authority (for a country that is not a Hague Adoption
Convention country) and has determined, based on this consultation, that the
foreign country does not have a child abuse registry.
Q: Are home
study preparers required to list each state in which a child abuse registry was
checked, or should the documented checks be included in the home study?
A:
The home
study preparer must ensure that a check of the applicant and of each additional
adult household member has been made with available child abuse registries in
any State or foreign country that the applicant, or any additional adult member
of the household, has resided in since that person's 18th birthday.
The home study must include results of the checks conducted, including when no
record was found to exist, that the State or foreign country will not release
information to the home study preparer or anyone in the household, or that the
State or foreign country does not have a child abuse registry.
Q: Two questions
arise from paragraph (2) of the definition of “adult member of the household” in
8 CFR 204.301:
-
When must a home study
preparer include in the home study an assessment of a household member who
“has not yet reached his or her 18th birthday?”
-
When must a home study
preparer include in the home study an assessment of someone “who does not
actually live at the same residence but whose presence in the residence is
relevant to the issue of suitability to adopt?”
A:
The home
study preparer is never required, under the USCIS rule, to include an assessment
of these persons as an adult member of the household, unless USCIS specifically
asks the home study preparer to do so. As a matter of routine practice, the home
study preparer needs only to assess the prospective adoptive parents and any
other adult members of the household, as defined in paragraph (1) of the
definition of “adult member of the household.”
In a given case, the
home study preparer may be aware of facts about another person that, in the home
study preparer’s considered professional judgment, could be relevant to the
issue of the applicant(s) suitability to adopt. For example, a child who is not
yet 18 could have a criminal history, or a history of drug or alcohol abuse. In
such cases, if it is apparent that this person’s history could impact the
applicant’s suitability to adopt, it may be prudent for the home study preparer
to include this information in the home study and provide an appropriate
recommendation. Similarly, if the home study preparer’s reasoned professional
judgment is that there is some other person who does not live with the
applicant(s) “whose presence in the home is relevant to the issue of suitability
to adopt,” such as an extended family member who spends a lot of time at the
applicant’s residence, it would be prudent to include information about this
person in the home study, so that USCIS can make an informed decision on the
case. The USCIS adjudicator reviewing such a home study would then be able to
determine whether to request an additional Form I-800A, Supplement 1, with the
applicable biometrics fee. Once USCIS determines that an I-800A, Supplement 1 is
necessary for another person, Supplement 1 will be sent to the prospective
adoptive parent with instructions for that other person and the prospective
adoptive parent to complete and submit Supplement 1 to USCIS. The person then
must be evaluated by the home study preparer to ensure that the home study
addresses the requirements of 8 CFR 204.311 for that person.
However, the home
study preparer may limit his or her assessment to the prospective adoptive
parents as defined in paragraph (1) of the definition, and need not include
anyone else unless USCIS asks for this additional evaluation.
Adoptions under section 101(b)(1)(E) - children from Hague countries
Q. If a child
from a Hague Convention country is already in the United States, can the child
be deemed to be “habitually resident” in the United States, so that the child
can be adopted without complying with the Hague Adoption Convention and the
USCIS Hague interim rule?
A:
Under 8 CFR
204.2(d)(2)(vii)(F), a child who is present in the United States, but whose
habitual residence was in a Hague Convention country other than the United
States immediately before the child came to the United States, is still deemed
to be habitually resident in the other Hague Convention country for purposes of
the filing and approval of a visa petition based on the child’s adoption by a
citizen who is habitually resident in the United States. Thus, USCIS will
presume that the child’s adoption and immigration are governed by the Hague
Adoption Convention, the IAA, and 8 CFR 204 subpart C.
Since a child
described in 8 CFR 204.2(d)(2)(vii)(F), is still deemed to be habitually
resident in the other Hague Convention country, a U.S. citizen who is habitually
resident in the United States and who wants to adopt a child from a Hague
Convention country must, generally, follow the Hague Adoption Convention
process, even if the child is already in the United States. 8 CFR 204.309(b)(4)
specifically provides that a Form I-800A and Form I-800 can be filed, even if
the child is in the United States, if the other Hague Convention country is
willing to complete the Hague Adoption Convention process with respect to the
child.
In most cases,
adoption under the Hague Adoption Convention would be in the child’s best
interests, even if the child is present in the United States. The child may be
able to immigrate and, under section 320(a), acquire citizenship by automatic
naturalization, as a direct result of the adoption under the Hague Adoption
Convention. If the child is adopted without compliance with the Hague Adoption
Convention, the parent must have legal custody of the child and live with the
child for 2 years before the child can acquire permanent residence as the child
of the U.S. citizen adoptive parent, as defined under section 101(b)(1)(E) of
the Act.
There may be
situations, however, when the adopting parent is not able to complete a Hague
Adoption Convention adoption, because the Central Authority of the child’s
country has determined that, from its perspective, the Hague Adoption Convention
no longer applies to the child. The purpose of 8 CFR 204.2(d)(2)(vii)(F) is to
prevent the circumvention of the Hague Adoption Convention process. Thus, USCIS
has determined that 8 CFR 204.2(d)(2)(vii)(F) must be read in light of the Hague
Adoption Convention regulations in subpart C of 8 CFR part 204. If, under
subpart C, there is a sufficient basis for saying that the Hague Adoption
Convention and the implementing regulations no longer apply to a child who came
to the United States from another Hague Convention country, then USCIS can
conclude that 8 CFR 204.2(d)(2)(vii)(F) no longer applies.
The governing
regulation, 8 CFR 204.303(b), provides the principles for determining whether
the child is habitually resident in a country other than the country of
citizenship. This regulation does not explicitly apply to children in the United
States, but USCIS has determined that it can be interpreted to permit a finding
that a child who, under 8 CFR 204.2(d)(2)(vii)(F), is presumed to be habitually
resident in another Hague Convention country can be found to no longer be
habitually resident in that country, but to be habitually resident, now, in the
United States. USCIS will determine that 8 CFR 204.2(d)(2)(vii)(F) no longer
precludes approval of a Form I-130 if the adoption order that is submitted with
the Form I-130 expressly states that the Central Authority of the other Hague
Convention country has filed with the court a written statement indicating that
the Central Authority is aware of the child’s presence in the United States, and
of the proposed adoption, and that the Central Authority has determined that the
child is not habitually resident in that country. A copy of the written
statement from the Central Authority must also be submitted with the Form I-130
and the adoption order.
If the adoption order
shows that the Central Authority of the other Hague Convention country had
determined that the child was no longer habitually resident in that other Hague
Convention country, USCIS will accept that determination and, if all the other
requirements of section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Act are met, the Form I-130 may be
approved.
*For inquiries on
adoptions from Hague Convention countries, please call 1-877-424-8374
|